The Benefits
Analyzing one’s words can reveal actionable investigative insights, clues, leads, and investigative intelligence to guide the next steps of your legal and/or investigative strategies, such as:
Identifying deceptive subjects
Uncovering omitted information
Evaluating a person’s credibility
Discerning whether a person is a suspect or not
Discovering investigative leads
Formulating follow-up interview questions
Assessing credibility in “he said, she said” cases
Informing decision-making
Identify areas requiring corroboration
Guiding interview strategies
Detect manipulated timelines or alibis
Identify a likely suspect(s) from a pool of potential suspects
Reduce time wasted in investigations
Determine if a case or investigation should be closed, expanded, or redirected.
What You'll Receive
​
​Every engagement is tailored to your specific needs and may include:
Written or verbal analytical report
Executive summary of findings
Identification of credibility concerns
Analysis of omissions and inconsistencies
Recommended follow-up questions
Suggested investigative leads
Strategic observations to support legal or investigative decision-making
Example: “Woke up this morning and the vehicle was gone” is what the insured reported in his online claim that his vehicle was stolen. My analysis noted:
-He did not include the personal pronoun of “I” when he stated he woke up. He dissociated himself from personal involvement in these alleged actions.
​
-He used the definite article of “the” vehicle instead of the possessive pronoun of “My/our.” He psychologically distanced himself from the vehicle.
​
-The sentence is written in the passive voice instead of the active voice, obscuring the activities and responsibility.
​
-The verb “gone” was used which is a euphemism for stolen; therefore, he did not technically report it as “stolen”, he only implied it using non-committal language.
​
-The brevity and vagueness of the statement is inconsistent with the usual structure of a truthful statement.
​
-The statement lacks emotions from the author as could be expected immediately after this traumatic event.
-I concluded that this statement was likely false and was not stolen. Neighborhood cameras proved this to be true.
Request a free 30-minute case consultation